The listing under incorporates real consumer critiques from the applicant monitoring software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:
- Acquire, kind, and display resumes and any related candidate info
- Handle expertise swimming pools inside a customized workflow
- Allow communication between HR personnel, hiring supervisor, or recruiter and candidate
*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques might have been edited for readability.
1. Greenhouse: Greatest for structured hiring and interview planning
Primarily based on my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, Greenhouse simplifies recruitment workflows with instruments for candidate monitoring, group collaboration, and seamless integrations with numerous HR software program.
One characteristic that I continuously see getting lots of reward is ease of use. Customers usually spotlight the clear and logically structured interface, which makes navigation simple for hiring managers and recruiters. Monitoring candidates by totally different hiring levels feels seamless, with important info readily accessible. Many G2 reviewers recognize the system’s potential to facilitate collaboration by permitting a number of group members to go away structured suggestions with out cluttering the method.
One other standout functionality, in response to customers, is sturdy integrations. Greenhouse integrates with all kinds of HR instruments, starting from background examine suppliers to scheduling software program. G2 reviewers constantly point out that the mixing course of is easy, with out requiring extreme configurations or workarounds. This makes Greenhouse a super alternative for corporations that depend on a number of instruments for various elements of the recruitment course of.
A generally appreciated aspect is reporting and analytics. Greenhouse’s customizable experiences present deep insights into hiring tendencies, recruiter efficiency, and candidate pipelines. From my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, many customers worth the clear, data-driven metrics that assist enhance recruitment methods over time. Whether or not it is for a fast overview or extra detailed experiences, customers be aware that the system makes it simple to drag the numbers they want.
Nevertheless, customization tends to obtain blended suggestions. Some G2 customers really feel that whereas Greenhouse covers all of the important options, it lacks flexibility in areas like workflows and automatic actions. I’ve observed that for groups in search of a totally tailor-made ATS, this could be a limitation, as they could have to work throughout the platform’s present constraints.
Moreover, candidate administration is some extent of frustration for some customers. Whereas the system does a superb job of retaining candidates organized, managing extra advanced hiring pipelines isn’t at all times easy. A number of reviewers point out that the search and filtering features could possibly be improved, particularly when coping with giant applicant swimming pools.
That stated, Greenhouse continues to be one of the broadly trusted ATS platforms, particularly for bigger groups that want construction and scalability. With a G2 score of 4.4 out of 5, it earns constant reward for its usability, integrations, and talent to maintain hiring workflows on observe.
What I like about Greenhouse:
- I’ve observed that the system’s intuitive interface is continuously praised for making hiring workflows smoother, permitting customers to maneuver candidates by totally different levels with out confusion.
- Seamless integrations with different HR instruments are sometimes highlighted, saving time on handbook information entry and eliminating the necessity to continuously change between platforms to maintain info updated.
What G2 customers like about Greenhouse:
“What I really like most about Greenhouse is its ease of use and the intensive market of third-party purposes, which give it superpowers by the various obtainable integrations. It’s uncommon to discover a vendor that isn’t built-in with Greenhouse. Many recruiters have labored with Greenhouse sooner or later of their careers, which implies the ramp-up time for them is normally very brief. Their assist group is dependable, offering environment friendly options, and their studying middle is extremely complete.”
– Greenhouse Evaluation, Daniel M.
What I dislike about Greenhouse:
- I’ve come throughout suggestions mentioning that customization choices for workflows and automations really feel a bit restrictive, with customers wishing for extra flexibility to tailor hiring processes to particular wants.
- Managing candidates throughout a number of roles or advanced hiring wants appears to be a problem, as looking and filtering by giant volumes of candidates isn’t as refined as many customers anticipate.
What G2 customers dislike about Greenhouse:
“Trying to find candidates within the resume database is Greenhouse’s best weak spot. Whereas you are able to do a Boolean search and use filters, the displayed outcomes aren’t notably useful. In the event that they added AI with pure language search, it will significantly enhance the expertise. Moreover, the workflow for reviewing candidates is to take a look at one resume at a time and both reject or advance them. It could be higher to slim down the listing of candidates being reviewed earlier than going by this course of.”
– Greenhouse Evaluation, Invoice B.
2. BambooHR: Greatest for seamless hiring-to-onboarding transition
From my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, BambooHR affords a complete suite of HR instruments designed to streamline hiring and worker administration. It contains a user-friendly interface, a devoted cellular app for on-the-go entry, and an ATS that simplifies the recruitment course of.
One characteristic that I continuously see getting lots of reward is cellular accessibility. G2 customers recognize how the cellular app permits workers to examine schedules, request break day, and keep up to date while not having a desktop. Many reviewers point out that this comfort of accessing HR instruments anytime, wherever, considerably enhances every day operations.
One other generally appreciated aspect is BambooHR’s applicant monitoring system (ATS). Customers spotlight its potential to simplify resume screening, observe candidate progress, and schedule interviews. Based on suggestions I gathered, reviewers worth the way it organizes applicant information effectively, lowering the necessity for handbook monitoring. That is notably helpful for hiring groups searching for an easy, well-structured ATS resolution.
When it comes to ease of use, BambooHR’s user-friendly interface stands out in critiques. Many G2 customers recognize how the platform makes navigation easy, even for non-tech-savvy people. The logical menu design and clear structure are constantly praised for making it simple to handle worker information or generate HR experiences.
On the draw back, chat assist tends to obtain some blended suggestions. A number of G2 customers point out that when dealing with technical difficulties or pressing queries, counting on e-mail or telephone assist slows down the decision course of.
Moreover, reporting and dashboard capabilities are sometimes identified as a limitation. I’ve seen G2 customers be aware points with BambooHR’s primary analytics, noting that experiences lack depth. A number of critiques point out that the restricted customization choices make it troublesome to generate extremely particular insights, which may hinder data-driven decision-making.
BambooHR stays a favourite for HR groups that worth simplicity and seamless onboarding. With a G2 score of 4.4 out of 5, it’s praised for its user-friendly design and all-in-one HR performance.
What I like about BambooHR:
- I’ve observed that the cellular app is usually praised for making it simple to entry HR features on the go, permitting customers to handle duties like time-off requests and schedules while not having to log right into a desktop.
- The ATS performance is continuously highlighted for its structured and user-friendly design, enabling environment friendly monitoring of candidates with out the necessity for handbook group of candidate information.
What G2 customers like about BambooHR:
“BambooHR is a extremely user-friendly and intuitive HR system. The platform is designed for ease of use, making it easy to replace and handle each candidate and worker information effectively. It is a superb software for monitoring and organizing HR processes. Moreover, BambooHR is straightforward to implement and affords nice digital occasion options, enhancing worker engagement and collaboration.”
– BambooHR Evaluation, Aicha B.
What I dislike about BambooHR:
- I’ve seen some customers categorical frustration with the real-time chat assist characteristic, as there are gaps that may make it tougher to get fast solutions when wanted, usually forcing reliance on slower e-mail or telephone assist.
- Reporting capabilities are continuously talked about as restricted, with many customers discovering the customization choices restrictive when producing detailed analytics.
What G2 customers dislike about BambooHR:
“My largest criticism about BambooHR is once I obtain e-mail replies from Buyer Assist, they do not embody my unique e-mail to them. I am a busy individual, as most HR execs are, and if an excessive amount of time goes by earlier than I get a reply, I generally neglect precisely what I wanted assist with. I actually cannot consider any complaints I’ve with the BambooHR system itself.”
– BambooHR Evaluation, Sandy Ok.
Associated: Assess the success of your hiring technique. Uncover the right way to calculate recruitment ROI.
3. JobDiva: Greatest for AI-driven resume matching and sourcing
Primarily based on my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, JobDiva is acknowledged for integrating AI-powered options with sturdy information administration capabilities, serving to recruiters streamline sourcing, hiring, and monitoring candidates whereas sustaining a centralized database.
One characteristic that I see getting lots of reward is AI-powered candidate matching. The platform’s algorithm scans resumes and job descriptions to counsel prime candidates, considerably lowering handbook search time. From the suggestions I gathered from G2 customers, many recognize how this automation permits recruiters to concentrate on participating with appropriate candidates, saving them hours of sifting by purposes.
One other standout functionality, in response to customers, is centralized information administration. JobDiva centralizes all recruitment information, together with candidate historical past, job particulars, and communication logs, making it simpler for customers to trace hiring progress and revisit previous interactions. I’ve observed that G2 reviewers continuously spotlight the system’s structured method to organizing recruitment information, which ensures that vital particulars are simply accessible and never misplaced within the course of.
Some customers have additionally highlighted JobDiva’s buyer assist as a serious power. A number of G2 critiques point out that the assist group is responsive and useful, resolving each minor and extra advanced points effectively. This stage of assist is a generally appreciated aspect for recruiters who depend on seamless platform efficiency.
On the flip facet, sluggish loading instances are a recurring theme within the G2 critiques. Some customers discover sure pages take longer to load than anticipated, which may develop into a bottleneck when working beneath tight deadlines.
Moreover, occasional lag and glitches have been identified in a number of G2 critiques. Customers have talked about that navigating particular options can generally end in delays or minor bugs, which require refreshing the web page. Whereas this isn’t thought-about a dealbreaker, I’ve observed that these points can hinder effectivity, particularly for customers managing a number of candidates without delay.
Nonetheless, JobDiva shines with its AI-driven candidate matching and centralized information administration. Holding a powerful G2 score of 4.7 out of 5, it’s usually thought to be one of the highly effective ATS options for staffing businesses and high-volume hiring.
What I like about JobDiva:
- The AI-powered candidate matching characteristic is usually praised for saving time by surfacing essentially the most related candidates, simplifying workflows and lowering the necessity for handbook resume screening.
- I’ve observed that JobDiva’s information administration system is continuously highlighted for organizing recruitment info, making it simple to trace candidate progress and revisit previous interactions.
What G2 customers like about JobDiva:
“The side I recognize most about JobDiva is its ease of discovering appropriate candidates from a pool of over 100 thousand people. Moreover, we will replace the notes part for every candidate, making info accessible to all customers. JobDiva additionally affords glorious buyer assist, with responses sometimes obtained inside minutes. Its simple implementation of guidelines and laws is one more reason why it has so many customers.”
– JobDiva Evaluation, Yuven B.
What I dislike about JobDiva:
- I’ve observed that sluggish web page loading can generally be a problem, with delays when navigating between sections, which might be irritating throughout busy duties.
- I’ve skilled occasional lags or glitches on the platform, which might be disruptive, particularly when managing a number of candidates without delay.
What G2 customers dislike about JobDiva:
“When coping with a lot of information, generally it turns into just a little bit sluggish, or the location will get down, particularly throughout the peak time.”
– JobDiva Evaluation, Sumit Ok.
4. Ceipal ATS: Greatest for automated sourcing and VMS integration
From my evaluation of G2 consumer suggestions, Ceipal ATS is broadly appreciated for its ease of use. Many G2 customers spotlight how intuitive the interface is, making it simple to navigate between totally different recruitment features. Whether or not customers are trying to find candidates or managing job postings, the platform’s simplicity eliminates the necessity for intensive coaching, permitting recruiters to concentrate on hiring duties fairly than mastering advanced software program.
One other characteristic that G2 customers constantly reward is resume parsing. The platform successfully extracts key particulars from resumes and robotically organizes them into structured profiles. Based on suggestions, this characteristic is a major time-saver, lowering handbook information entry and guaranteeing that candidate info is constantly formatted, which improves the effectiveness of searches.
Candidate database group additionally receives optimistic suggestions. The flexibility to retailer, search, and retrieve candidate profiles effectively is a generally appreciated side. Reviewers point out how having all candidate info in a single place streamlines their workflow and reduces administrative duties, permitting recruiters to concentrate on engagement.
Nevertheless, I’ve seen some customers categorical points with efficiency pace on G2. Some reviewers point out that processes like loading candidate profiles or operating searches can take longer than anticipated. Whereas these delays aren’t a dealbreaker for many, they will develop into disruptive when working beneath tight deadlines.
One other level of suggestions I’ve come throughout on G2 is the restricted customization choices. Whereas Ceipal ATS covers the core recruitment wants, some G2 customers be aware that the power to tailor workflows, experiences, and search parameters is considerably restricted. This could possibly be a problem for groups that require extra flexibility to adapt the platform to particular wants.
However, Ceipal ATS constantly impresses with its intuitive interface and superior resume parsing. Its G2 score of 4.6 out of 5reflects sturdy consumer satisfaction, particularly for recruiters managing giant applicant swimming pools.
What I like about Ceipal ATS:
- I’ve observed that the interface is usually praised for being simple, making it simple to handle hiring duties while not having to spend a lot time studying the system.
- Resume parsing is continuously highlighted as a time-saving characteristic, robotically extracting key candidate particulars and lowering the necessity for handbook information entry.
What G2 customers like about Ceipal ATS:
“Ceipal is the perfect platform for sending mass emails to all my candidates. It’s also very simple to publish jobs on job boards. My favourite characteristic of Ceipal is how easy it’s to create a job publish.”
– Ceipal ATS Evaluation, Uday Ok.
What I dislike about Ceipal ATS:
- I’ve come throughout suggestions mentioning that the platform might be sluggish at instances, particularly when trying to find candidates or loading profiles, with customers sometimes having to attend longer than anticipated for outcomes.
- Many customers, together with myself, really feel that customization choices are considerably restricted, notably with regards to experiences and workflow changes, with a need for extra flexibility to tailor the system to particular wants.
What G2 customers dislike about Ceipal ATS:
“Typically the system runs slowly, inflicting delays in importing profiles. Moreover, I’m unsure about the right way to contact buyer assist if I encounter any technical points or errors with Ceipal ATS.”
– Ceipal ATS Evaluation, Dhivyashree J.
5. Lever: Greatest for collaborative hiring with CRM performance
From my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, Lever is very regarded for its integrations, that are seen as certainly one of its largest benefits. Many G2 customers spotlight how seamlessly the platform connects with key recruitment instruments like LinkedIn RSC, enabling them to trace outreach and sync notes with out handbook intervention. Moreover, the Information Explorer add-on is continuously praised for enhancing reporting capabilities, permitting customers to generate customized insights with ease.
One other standout characteristic that I see getting lots of reward is ease of implementation. G2 customers constantly point out how easy the onboarding course of is. The setup is described as simple, and lots of reviewers be aware the proactive function performed by buyer assist in guaranteeing they had been up and operating rapidly. The low want for intensive coaching throughout setup can also be appreciated by a number of customers.
Usability is one other space the place Lever receives optimistic suggestions. Many reviewers point out how the clear, fashionable interface makes navigation simple, which simplifies managing job postings, monitoring candidates, and reviewing experiences. Primarily based on suggestions, the low studying curve stands out as a notable profit, permitting new customers to get snug with the system rapidly.
Nevertheless, I’ve come throughout issues round lag points. Some G2 customers level out that sure actions, like loading profiles or switching between views, can really feel sluggish at instances. Though these delays aren’t frequent, they will disrupt workflow at instances.
One other level of suggestions that I’ve observed on G2 is the use of various terminology. Whereas this doesn’t have an effect on performance, some G2 customers discover it barely complicated in comparison with the usual ATS terminology they’re used to. This adjustment interval could make the platform really feel much less intuitive for some customers at first.
Even with occasional lag and a slight studying curve round terminology, Lever stands out for its fashionable design, integrations, and built-in CRM options. With a G2 score of 4.3 out of 5, it stays a preferred alternative for collaborative hiring groups.
What I like about Lever:
- I’ve observed that Lever’s integrations are continuously praised for making it simple to attach with recruitment instruments like LinkedIn RSC and superior reporting options, eliminating the necessity to change between totally different platforms.
- The implementation course of is usually highlighted as well-structured and well-supported, permitting new customers to get began rapidly with out a lot problem.
What G2 customers like about Lever:
“I discover that Lever is straightforward to make use of for including candidates from numerous sources, scheduling interviews, customizing interview templates, and importing a limiteless variety of resumes and paperwork. We additionally put it to use to seek for candidates within the database.”
– Lever Evaluation, Susan H.
What I dislike about Lever:
- Occasional lag within the system is one thing I’ve seen some customers point out, particularly when switching between sections or loading candidate profiles, which may decelerate the method.
- Terminology changes could be a hurdle, as I’ve personally discovered that it took a while to get used to sure phrases, particularly coming from a unique area.
What G2 customers dislike about Lever:
“There may be not a great way to pause a candidate’s progress, particularly when a job goes on maintain or shall be delayed however you are still sourcing candidates.”
– Lever Evaluation, Betsy Ok.
6. Zoho Recruit: Greatest for customizable workflows and multi-channel sourcing
From my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, Zoho Recruit stands out for its customization capabilities. A constant theme in critiques is the platform’s customization choices, which permit customers to switch modules and automate workflows. Many G2 reviewers spotlight how simple it’s to tailor recruitment processes to particular enterprise wants. This flexibility ensures that duties might be extra environment friendly and suited to every group’s distinctive workflow, with out counting on cumbersome workarounds.
I continuously see G2 reviewers point out recruitment administration as certainly one of Zoho Recruit’s strengths. The platform centralizes candidate monitoring, interview scheduling, and collaboration, overlaying each stage of the hiring course of. This reduces the necessity for exterior instruments, making it simpler to handle job postings and applicant progress. As soon as customers develop into aware of the structure, many be aware how the system simplifies these duties.
A generally appreciated aspect is buyer assist. Customers constantly reward Zoho Recruit’s assist group for being responsive and useful. Based on suggestions from G2 customers, having fast help obtainable is especially helpful throughout the preliminary setup part, easing the transition and serving to customers navigate the platform with minimal frustration.
Nevertheless, based mostly on my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, I’ve observed some customers point out a studying curve. Whereas Zoho Recruit affords sturdy options, many G2 reviewers level out that getting snug with all of the customization choices and settings takes time. New customers might have extra onboarding earlier than they will absolutely make the most of the platform’s capabilities.
One other problem that continuously seems in G2 critiques is integration inconsistencies. Whereas Zoho Recruit integrates with numerous third-party instruments, some customers be aware that syncing with calendars or linking to different HR programs doesn’t at all times perform easily. These occasional hiccups usually require handbook changes or workarounds, which may disrupt workflow effectivity.
Although the platform comes with a studying curve and occasional integration hiccups, Zoho Recruit is well-loved for its customization and automation capabilities. With a G2 score of 4.4 out of 5, it’s a flexible possibility for companies of all sizes, particularly small companies.
What I like about Zoho Recruit:
- Primarily based on my evaluate of consumer suggestions, customization choices in Zoho Recruit permit me to tailor workflows and automate duties, making recruitment extra environment friendly.
- I’ve observed that the platform covers all elements of hiring, from monitoring candidates to managing interviews, lowering the necessity for exterior instruments.
What G2 customers like about Zoho Recruit:
“Discovering candidates can usually be a prolonged and complicated course of, however Zoho Recruit has made it extra streamlined and arranged. From candidate searches and course of monitoring to interview scheduling and the ultimate hiring stage, every little thing is far simpler to handle.
With Zoho Recruit’s reporting instruments, I can entry an in depth listing of all candidates registered on the corporate’s job portal. This enables me to evaluate their profiles, perceive their expertise, and choose the perfect match for the emptiness.
The platform’s setup is easy, and the general consumer expertise is very intuitive and environment friendly, offering glorious assist to the recruitment course of and serving to preserve clear group for each candidate.”
– Zoho Recruit Evaluation, Ray R.
What I dislike about Zoho Recruit:
- The system’s studying curve is one thing I’ve seen talked about by customers, because it took me a while to completely grasp all its options and customization settings.
- Integrations generally require extra setup and changes, however as soon as configured correctly, I discovered that they labored effectively throughout the platform.
What G2 customers dislike about Zoho Recruit:
“Some extra superior options might require technical information, nonetheless new customers can begin with pre-configured templates to progressively study and discover the extra advanced options.”
– Zoho Recruit Evaluation, Paul O.
7. HROne: Greatest for end-to-end HR and recruitment administration
Primarily based on my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, HRone is usually seen as a flexible resolution for companies, providing a broad vary of HR instruments, from recruitment administration to payroll processing. A constant theme in critiques is its intuitive interface, which is appreciated for minimizing the educational curve for brand spanking new customers.
Many G2 reviewers spotlight how simple it’s to handle job postings, observe candidates, or deal with payroll, with the platform’s accessible structure making key features simple to find and lowering time spent on administrative duties.
I’ve observed that the feature-rich platform is one other side G2 customers continuously reward. HRone affords an intensive suite of HR instruments, together with attendance monitoring and efficiency administration. Many customers recognize how these numerous features are built-in right into a single system, eliminating the necessity for a number of exterior instruments and making it simpler to handle end-to-end HR operations multi function place.
One standout characteristic that I see getting lots of reward is payroll administration. Customers recognize how the system automates payroll calculations, lowering the danger of handbook errors and guaranteeing well timed wage processing. That is usually seen as a serious time-saver and a key profit for companies managing payroll on a big scale.
Nevertheless, I’ve come throughout some blended suggestions round efficiency pace. Some G2 customers point out that sure duties, resembling loading experiences or switching between modules, can take longer than anticipated. Whereas these slowdowns will not be constant, they will disrupt workflow effectivity, notably throughout busy durations when time is of the essence.
I’ve additionally seen some customers categorical points with information deletion choices. There doesn’t appear to be a approach to completely delete sure information, which could possibly be a priority for corporations with strict information retention insurance policies. Many customers counsel {that a} extra versatile method to information deletion and archival can be useful, permitting companies to higher handle their historic information.
Irrespective of those minor hiccups, , HROne delivers a strong all-in-one HR suite that simplifies recruitment and payroll. Its spectacular G2 score of 4.8 out of 5 highlights sturdy consumer confidence and satisfaction.
What I like about HROne:
- Primarily based on my evaluate of consumer suggestions, the interface is usually praised for being intuitive and straightforward to navigate, making HR duties extra environment friendly with minimal studying time.
- HRone’s options are continuously highlighted for permitting customers to handle every little thing from recruitment to efficiency monitoring in a single platform.
What G2 customers like about HROne:
“Discount of handbook information as it’s robotically captured from the app and experiences are generated. Attendance information might be accessed from wherever anytime of any worker. Location can also be tracked for monitoring function whereas marking attendance.”
– HROne Evaluation, Arjan M.
What I dislike about HROne:
- I’ve seen customers point out system pace, with some experiencing slowness when loading experiences or switching between totally different features.
- Information administration flexibility could possibly be improved, as I’ve observed customers, together with myself, would recognize extra management over managing and archiving sure info.
What G2 customers dislike about HROne:
“No customization is allowed within the profile part. It’s troublesome to create method for the pay elements and you can also’t share paperwork greater than 50 mb file dimension.”
– HROne Evaluation, Gangaraju M.
8. Teamtailor: Greatest for candidate-centric hiring and branding
From my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, Teamtailor is well known for serving to recruiters handle purposes effectively whereas providing a optimistic candidate expertise. One of many standout options that G2 reviewers constantly spotlight is automation. Customers recognize how the platform automates repetitive duties, resembling candidate screening and follow-up emails, which helps hold communication constant and ensures no candidate is neglected. This protects recruiters time and permits them to focus extra on participating with candidates.
I continuously see G2 reviewers point out collaboration as a serious plus. The flexibility to share notes, tag group members, and depart structured suggestions makes it simpler for hiring groups to work collectively throughout the platform. Many customers spotlight how this eliminates the necessity for scattered emails or exterior messaging apps, streamlining communication and fostering smoother collaboration between hiring managers and recruiters.
One characteristic that G2 customers actually recognize is branding capabilities. Teamtailor’s profession web site builder permits corporations to create an interesting careers web page while not having technical expertise. Reviewers usually reward the customization choices, which make it simple to align the profession web site with an organization’s employer model, enhancing the general candidate expertise.
Nevertheless, based mostly on my evaluate of G2 consumer suggestions, the cellular expertise wants enchancment. Whereas the desktop model is usually praised for its ease of use, many customers point out that navigating the platform on cellular units could possibly be extra seamless. Duties like reviewing purposes on the go might be extra cumbersome because of the lack of cellular optimization, which some customers discover inconvenient.
Moreover, I’ve come throughout critiques mentioning occasional glitches. Whereas not main dealbreakers, customers have identified points resembling delays in loading candidate profiles or inconsistencies in CV parsing. These minor technical hiccups sometimes disrupt workflow and may gain advantage from additional enhancements to boost the platform’s general effectivity.
However Teamtailor wins recruiters over with branding capabilities and automation options that elevate the candidate expertise. With a G2 score of 4.6 out of 5, it’s acknowledged as a candidate-friendly ATS that scales with rising groups.
What I like about Teamtailor:
- Automation options are extremely appreciated, as I discovered it simple to arrange workflows that deal with repetitive duties effectively.
- Collaboration instruments stand out for simplifying suggestions sharing and communication with hiring managers, serving to hold everybody on the identical web page with out the necessity for further emails.
What G2 customers like about Teamtailor:
“We like the way it has remodeled our course of tremendously, shifting us from a chilly, impersonal recruiter in direction of an company that’s enabled to be participating (Nurture Marketing campaign). It’s intuitive, candidate-friendly, and truly makes hiring really feel like a two-way dialog fairly than simply filling a job. Plus, the careersite has been extraordinarily useful. The sport changer is basically the current improvement of Co-pilot that permits you to display by a whole lot of CVs based mostly in your screening standards.”
– Teamtailor Evaluation, Josiah L.
What I dislike about Teamtailor:
- The cellular model is not as easy because the desktop expertise, with some duties being tougher to finish on the go, in response to consumer suggestions.
- I’ve observed occasional glitches, resembling slow-loading candidate profiles, which some customers point out as a minor frustration.
What G2 customers dislike about Teamtailor:
“My solely critique can be that to entry the transcription characteristic, the interview needs to be recorded, which I discover a bit pricey. Consequently, I had to make use of Tactiq for transcription and note-taking as a substitute.”
– Teamtailor Evaluation, Antonella S.
Discover this pricing information for applicant monitoring programs to know the important thing components to contemplate when selecting ATS instruments.
Often requested questions on applicant monitoring programs
1. What’s the finest applicant monitoring system for recruiters?
For recruiters targeted on effectivity, Greenhouse affords structured hiring processes, whereas Lever combines ATS and CRM for higher candidate engagement. JobDiva gives AI-driven automation for high-volume sourcing, and Ceipal ATS excels in resume parsing and vendor administration. These platforms assist organized hiring, collaboration, and data-driven decision-making.
2. What’s the finest ATS resume checker?
Greenhouse and Lever use AI to rank candidates for efficient resume screening, whereas JobDiva and Ceipal ATS focus on detailed parsing and key phrase matching. Zoho Recruit automates resume evaluation, serving to recruiters concentrate on essentially the most certified candidates.
3. What’s the finest ATS for small companies?
Small companies profit from ATS platforms which might be simple to make use of and adaptable. BambooHR simplifies hiring with built-in HR instruments, Zoho Recruit affords cost-effective automation, HROne connects hiring with different HR features, and Teamtailor helps with branding and candidate expertise. These choices make hiring extra manageable for rising groups.
4. What are the perfect applicant monitoring programs for staffing businesses?
Staffing businesses depend on ATS platforms that assist high-volume hiring. JobDiva stands out with AI-driven sourcing, Ceipal ATS improves candidate monitoring with VMS integrations, Zoho Recruit affords workflows constructed for staffing wants, and Greenhouse helps recruiters assess candidates successfully. These instruments make it simpler to deal with giant applicant swimming pools.
5. Is there a web-based applicant monitoring system?
Sure, all of the listed ATS platforms are cloud-based. They permit recruiters and HR groups to entry hiring instruments from any location, providing flexibility and integration with different software program.
6. What are the favored applicant monitoring options for HR groups?
In my expertise reviewing dozens of platforms, instruments like Greenhouse, BambooHR, Lever, and Zoho Recruit constantly stand out as a number of the hottest applicant monitoring options for HR groups. They provide intuitive candidate pipelines, built-in collaboration instruments, and integrations that make it simpler for HR to handle hiring from begin to end.
7. What’s the highest rated ATS for fast-growing tech companies?
Quick-growing tech companies want ATS platforms that may scale rapidly whereas retaining hiring groups environment friendly. From what I’ve seen, Lever and Greenhouse are two of the highest rated ATS choices for tech corporations that want flexibility, automation, and CRM-style candidate engagement as their hiring wants develop.
8. Which firm affords the perfect applicant monitoring system?
It actually will depend on your organization’s dimension and hiring wants. Primarily based on G2 critiques, Greenhouse usually ranks as top-of-the-line applicant monitoring programs for bigger groups, whereas BambooHR and Zoho Recruit provide nice choices for corporations in search of extra simple, easy-to-manage options.
9. What’s the most beneficial ATS service for mid-sized corporations?
For mid-sized corporations balancing progress with funds, Zoho Recruit, JobDiva, and Ceipal ATS have been a number of the most beneficial ATS companies. They provide sturdy customization, reporting, and automation options that work effectively for groups which might be increasing however don’t but want full enterprise-level complexity.
10. What’s the perfect recruiting software program with built-in ATS?
A number of platforms mix recruiting software program with absolutely built-in ATS performance. From what I’ve examined, Lever, Zoho Recruit, and Teamtailor provide sturdy end-to-end recruiting instruments the place you get applicant monitoring, sourcing, interview scheduling, and collaboration options multi function system.
11. What’s the perfect ATS app for recruiting within the software program business?
In relation to recruiting within the software program business, I’ve discovered that Greenhouse and Lever carry out particularly effectively. Each provide integrations with developer hiring platforms, technical assessments, and workflows that make it simpler to rent for engineering and product roles the place pace and technical match are important.
12. What are the main applicant monitoring programs for service corporations?
Service corporations usually want applicant monitoring programs that assist high-volume hiring, versatile workflows, and powerful collaboration options. Primarily based on my testing, Ceipal ATS, Zoho Recruit, and HROne have been strong selections for service industries managing ongoing recruitment throughout a number of places and roles.
13. What’s the highest ATS software program for tech startups?
For tech startups constructing out early-stage hiring processes, G2 customers suggest beginning with platforms like BambooHR, Teamtailor, or Lever. They’re versatile sufficient for small groups however nonetheless provide the construction and automation you want as hiring ramps up, which makes them a number of the prime ATS software program selections for tech startups.
14. Are there user-friendly ATS choices for cellular recruitment?
Sure. BambooHR is usually praised for its cellular app, making it one of the user-friendly ATS choices for cellular recruitment. Teamtailor additionally helps mobile-friendly workflows, serving to recruiters handle duties wherever.
Rent with none problem
Discovering the best applicant monitoring system could make all of the distinction in the way you rent, handle candidates, and hold your group aligned. Whether or not you are dealing with high-volume recruiting, constructing a structured hiring course of, or trying to find an answer that grows with your enterprise, the best software could make each step simpler.
From automating repetitive duties to bettering collaboration, the perfect ATS choices listed below are designed to create a smoother expertise for everybody. I’ve completed the analysis, breaking down the professionals, cons, and key options, so that you don’t should. Now, the one query left is: Which one most closely fits your hiring wants?
Interested by how your HR operations are performing? Discover HR analytics software program.
